Re: [PATCH 0/4] media: ov2680: follow up from initial version

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ola Fabio,
On Tue 08 May 2018 at 13:29, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Rui,

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Rui Miguel Silva <rui.silva@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sorry I have Out-of-Office some part of last week, I had v6 of the original series ready but since I have received the notification from patchwork that the v5 was accepted, I am sending this as a follow up tha address Fabio comments.

- this adds the power supplies to this sensor
- fix gpio polarity and naming.

Cheers,
   Rui


Rui Miguel Silva (4):
  media: ov2680: dt: add voltage supplies as required
  media: ov2680: dt: rename gpio to reset and fix polarity
  media: ov2680: rename powerdown gpio and fix polarity
  media: ov2680: add regulators to supply control

As the initial ov2680 series has not been applied, I think it would be
better if you send a new version with all these fixes.

What I've got was this from patchwork:
Hello,

The following patches (submitted by you) have been updated in patchwork:

* linux-media: [v5,1/2] media: ov2680: dt: Add bindings for OV2680
    - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/48819/
    - for: Linux Media kernel patches
   was: New
   now: Accepted

* linux-media: [v4,1/2] media: ov2680: dt: Add bindings for OV2680
    - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/48357/
    - for: Linux Media kernel patches
   was: New
   now: Accepted

This email is a notification only - you do not need to respond.

-

Patches submitted to linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx have the following
possible states:

<snip>

Accepted: when some driver maintainer says that the patch will be applied via his tree, or when everything is ok and it got applied either at the main tree or via some other tree (fixes tree; some other maintainer's tree - when it belongs to other subsystems,
	  etc);

So, my understand is that the patches will be applied or are already applied to someone tree (strange patchwork does not send who or which tree), but since I do not want to break someone workflow I will wait for some maintainer word on this... If it is better to send the original series
or the follow up patches.

Thanks for your feedback.
---
Cheers,
	Rui

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux