Re: [PATCH v5 01/14] dt-bindings: connector: add properties for typec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Freitag, den 04.05.2018, 08:59 +0000 schrieb Jun Li:
> 
> > > > Can one implement a device that can operate as either DFP or UFP,
> > > > but not implements the dynamic role switch that a DRP must support?
> > > 
> > > You mean a port with DRD on data but not DRP on power?
> > > 
> > > The data-role is newly added as the data role is not coupled with
> > > power
> > 
> > No, I meant data role. As far as I can tell for a DRP you need to implement the
> > detection logic described in chapter 4 of the spec.
> 
> Could you please point me the "detection logic" of typec spec chapter 4
> you are referring to?

Chapter 4.5.2.2, especially state diagramms 4.15 and 4.16

It just seems to me that a DRP and a physical port that can be switched
between UFP and DFP are not the same thing, but can be implemented.

	Regards
		Oliver

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux