Hi,
On Fri, 2018-04-20 at 09:51 +0000, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:46 AM Paul Kocialkowski <
> paul.kocialkowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [snip]
> > +struct v4l2_ctrl_mpeg2_frame_hdr {
> > + __u32 slice_len;
> > + __u32 slice_pos;
> > + enum { MPEG1, MPEG2 } type;
>
> Is enum suitable for UAPI?
As it turns out, it's not :)
> > +
> > + __u16 width;
> > + __u16 height;
> > +
> > + enum { PCT_I = 1, PCT_P, PCT_B, PCT_D } picture_coding_type;
>
> Ditto.
>
> > + __u8 f_code[2][2];
> > +
> > + __u8 intra_dc_precision;
> > + __u8 picture_structure;
> > + __u8 top_field_first;
> > + __u8 frame_pred_frame_dct;
> > + __u8 concealment_motion_vectors;
> > + __u8 q_scale_type;
> > + __u8 intra_vlc_format;
> > + __u8 alternate_scan;
> > +
> > + __u8 backward_ref_index;
> > + __u8 forward_ref_index;
> > +};
> > +
> > #endif
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h
>
> b/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h
> > index 31b5728b56e9..4b8336f7bcf0 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/videodev2.h
> > @@ -635,6 +635,7 @@ struct v4l2_pix_format {
> > #define V4L2_PIX_FMT_VC1_ANNEX_L v4l2_fourcc('V', 'C', '1', 'L')
> > /*
>
> SMPTE 421M Annex L compliant stream */
> > #define V4L2_PIX_FMT_VP8 v4l2_fourcc('V', 'P', '8', '0') /*
> > VP8 */
> > #define V4L2_PIX_FMT_VP9 v4l2_fourcc('V', 'P', '9', '0') /*
> > VP9 */
> > +#define V4L2_PIX_FMT_MPEG2_FRAME v4l2_fourcc('M', 'G', '2', 'F') /*
>
> MPEG2 frame */
>
> > /* Vendor-specific formats */
> > #define V4L2_PIX_FMT_CPIA1 v4l2_fourcc('C', 'P', 'I', 'A') /*
> > cpia1
>
> YUV */
> > @@ -1586,6 +1587,7 @@ struct v4l2_ext_control {
> > __u8 __user *p_u8;
> > __u16 __user *p_u16;
> > __u32 __user *p_u32;
> > + struct v4l2_ctrl_mpeg2_frame_hdr __user
>
> *p_mpeg2_frame_hdr;
> > void __user *ptr;
> > };
> > } __attribute__ ((packed));
> > @@ -1631,6 +1633,7 @@ enum v4l2_ctrl_type {
> > V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_U8 = 0x0100,
> > V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_U16 = 0x0101,
> > V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_U32 = 0x0102,
> > + V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_MPEG2_FRAME_HDR = 0x0109,
>
> Why 0x0109?
Good catch. I see no reason in particular, so I'll probably make it
0x0103 eventually.
Cheers and thanks for the review!
--
Paul Kocialkowski, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.comAttachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
