Hi Dave, On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:06:17AM -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 00:33:45 +0800 > > > I should've mentioned that patches 3 ~ 10, and only these, should go > > through net-next. sunxi will handle the remaining clk, device tree, and > > soc driver patches. > > Ok, I just noticed this. > > Why don't you just post those patches separately as a series on their > own then, in order to avoid confusion? > > Then you can adjust the patch series header posting to explain the > non-net-next changes, where they got merged, and what they provide > in order to faciliate the net-next changes. I now that we usually have some feedback from non-net maintainers that they actually prefer seeing the full picture (and I also tend to prefer that as well) and having all the patches relevant to enable a particular feature, even if it means getting multiple maintainers involved. Just to make sure we understood you fully, do you want Chen-Yu to resend his serie following your comments, or was that just a general remark for next time? Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
