On 05/02/2018 09:37 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:50 PM, David Collins <collinsd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> +- vdd_l26-supply >> +- vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply >> +- vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply >> + Usage: optional (PM8998 only) >> + Value type: <phandle> >> + Definition: phandle of the parent supply regulator of one or more of the >> + regulators for this PMIC. > > One small additional nit here is that "vdd_lvs1_lvs2-supply" is listed twice. I'll remove the duplicate. > Also on the schematics (and in the PM8998 datasheet) I have this is > "VIN_LVS_1_2". It seems like you should be consistent here and call > this "vin-lvs-1-2-supply". I was trying to keep the naming consistent within device tree binding documentation for LVS vs LDO and SMPS (e.g. 'vdd' vs 'vin' prefix). I suppose that I can change this to match the hardware documentation pin name. I can also change '_' to '-' in the supply names if that is preferred. Take care, David -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
