Hello, On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 15:55:23 +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote: > Prepare the migration to new bindings where the ICU node has several > subnodes: one per interrupt group (NSR, SEI, REI, etc). The code for > each node will share the same set of registers. Turning the ICU node > into a syscon is a clean solution to handle that. > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> In fact, I am wondering if this is really necessary. Can't we instead just create the regmap() for the ICU MMIO region in the ->probe() of the parent ICU device ? Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
