On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On thing stuck out a bit with the bindings. I can see that you specify
> both fifo size and use the SoC suffix for the r8a7790 and r8a7791
> bindings. Isn't that a bit of redundant information there, if we know
> that the SoC is r8a7790 or r8a7791 then can't we simply put that
> information in r8a779x_data above and perhaps keep the binding
> simpler? Perhaps same thing applies to other properties as well?
"renesas,tx-fifo-size" and "renesas,rx-fifo-size" are part of the existing
bindings, so I'm a bit reluctant to change these.
Hmm, since the original bindings didn't specify the default values,
I could make them chip-specific, though.
The only other property is "num-cs", which can have any value if you
start using the generic "cs-gpios".
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
