Hi Sandeep, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on drm/drm-next] [also build test ERROR on v4.17-rc3 next-20180426] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Sandeep-Panda/Add-suppport-for-sn65dsi86-bridge-chip-and-Innolux-2k-edp-panel/20180430-035839 base: git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux.git drm-next config: x86_64-allmodconfig (attached as .config) compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-16) 7.3.0 reproduce: # save the attached .config to linux build tree make ARCH=x86_64 All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c:173:9: sparse: undefined identifier 'drm_edid_to_eld' drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c:400:5: sparse: symbol 'ti_sn_bridge_ref_clk_table' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c:553:6: sparse: symbol 'ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c:563:6: sparse: symbol 'ti_sn_bridge_post_disable' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c:173:24: sparse: call with no type! drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c: In function 'ti_sn_bridge_connector_get_modes': >> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c:173:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'drm_edid_to_eld'; did you mean 'drm_edid_to_sad'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] drm_edid_to_eld(connector, edid); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drm_edid_to_sad cc1: some warnings being treated as errors sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c:173:9: sparse: undefined identifier 'drm_edid_to_eld' >> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c:400:5: sparse: symbol 'ti_sn_bridge_ref_clk_table' was not declared. Should it be static? >> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c:553:6: sparse: symbol 'ti_sn_bridge_pre_enable' was not declared. Should it be static? >> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c:563:6: sparse: symbol 'ti_sn_bridge_post_disable' was not declared. Should it be static? >> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c:173:24: sparse: call with no type! drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c: In function 'ti_sn_bridge_connector_get_modes': drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c:173:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'drm_edid_to_eld'; did you mean 'drm_edid_to_sad'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] drm_edid_to_eld(connector, edid); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drm_edid_to_sad cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +173 drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c 148 149 static int ti_sn_bridge_connector_get_modes(struct drm_connector *connector) 150 { 151 struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = connector_to_ti_sn_bridge(connector); 152 struct drm_panel *panel = pdata->panel; 153 struct edid *edid; 154 155 if (panel) { 156 DRM_DEBUG("get mode from connected drm_panel\n"); 157 pdata->num_modes = drm_panel_get_modes(panel); 158 return pdata->num_modes; 159 } 160 161 /* get from EDID */ 162 if (!pdata->ddc) 163 return 0; 164 165 ti_sn_bridge_power_ctrl(pdata, true); 166 edid = drm_get_edid(connector, pdata->ddc); 167 ti_sn_bridge_power_ctrl(pdata, false); 168 if (!edid) 169 return 0; 170 171 drm_mode_connector_update_edid_property(connector, edid); 172 pdata->num_modes = drm_add_edid_modes(connector, edid); > 173 drm_edid_to_eld(connector, edid); 174 kfree(edid); 175 176 return pdata->num_modes; 177 } 178 --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
Attachment:
.config.gz
Description: application/gzip
