On 26/04/18 13:08, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > On Thursday 26 April 2018 02:25 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote: >> On 25/04/18 15:09, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>> Though MMC controller can indicate HS200/HS400 mode capability (by >>> using "mmc-hs200-1_8v"/"mmc-hs400-1_8v" dt property), if the IO lines >>> in the board is connected to 3.3v supply, HS200/HS400 mode cannot be >>> supported. Such boards have "no-1-8-v" property in their dts file. >>> Disable HS200/HS400 mode for boards which have "no-1-8-v" set. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx> >>> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 1 + >>> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 1 + >>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c >>> index 2ededa7f43df..b5f047b5f3ae 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c >>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c >>> @@ -3672,6 +3672,7 @@ int sdhci_setup_host(struct sdhci_host *host) >>> if (host->quirks2 & SDHCI_QUIRK2_NO_1_8_V) { >>> host->caps1 &= ~(SDHCI_SUPPORT_SDR104 | SDHCI_SUPPORT_SDR50 | >>> SDHCI_SUPPORT_DDR50); >>> + mmc->caps2 &= ~MMC_CAP2_HSX00_1_8V; >> >> Seems weird for sdhci to clear flags it never set. Also couldn't we >> reasonably expect dt properties to be consistent? Is this really about >> setting SDHCI_QUIRK2_NO_1_8_V in your driver and expecting it to override >> other dt properties? Although that still begs the question why anyone would >> set dt properties that the hardware doesn't support? I guess you should >> also clear MMC_CAP2_HS400_ES. > > The SoC might support a specific mode like HS200. So the SoC specific dtsi file > might have dt properties for HS200 mode set. But the board which uses the SoC > might be modeled in a way a particular mode cannot be used (like IO lines not > connected to 1.8v). One option is to use /delete-property/ in the board dts > file. But since "no-1-8-v" property already indicates HS200 mode cannot be > supported, having a /delete-property/ might be redundant. > > I can reset caps2 in sdhci-omap after invoking mmc_of_parse if you feel that > makes more sense. Just add the explanation to the commit message, add a comment to the code, and also clear MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR and MMC_CAP2_HS400_ES and MMC_CAP_UHS_*. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html