On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:17:11PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Maxime Ripard > <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 07:34:19PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > >> The Libre Computer Project ALL-H3-CC has three models, all using the > >> same board design, but with different pin compatible SoCs and amount of > >> DRAM. > >> > >> Currently only the H3 1GB DRAM variant is supported. To support the two > >> other variants, first split the original device tree into a common board > >> design part and an SoC specific part. > >> > >> The SoC part only defines which SoC is used and model name, and includes > >> the SoC specific dtsi file and the common design dtsi file. > >> > >> Also fix up the SPDX identifier line to use the correct comment style, > >> and place it on the first line. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> .../boot/dts/sun8i-h3-libretech-all-h3-cc.dts | 213 +----------------- > >> ....dts => sunxi-hx-libretech-all-h3-cc.dtsi} | 11 +- > > > > I think I prefer the name of Neil's DTSI better, and since pretty much > > the same patches (a couple of hours) before, we'll merge them (while > > merging the rest of your patches, obviously). > > > > Does that work for you? > > I would like for the regulator voltage fix to be merged before the split. > This will make it trivial to back port, instead of having to reverse the > split, and maybe failing. Yes, I was just talking about replacing your two redundant patches, but keeping the order you have. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons) Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
