Re: devicetree repository separation/migration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Feb 19, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Grant Likely wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 04:57:50PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
>>> It will be interesting to see which rules should apply for merging new
>>> bindings. I know that devicetrees should be OS agnostic, but sometimes
>>> they are modelled after how Linux currently works. What happens when the
>>> *BSD guys have different ideas how a good binding looks like? How will
>>> such conflicts be resolved?
>> 
>> That's more a question for Grant.  I assume we'll all put on our big-boy
>> pants and pick the best technical solution based on their merits. :)
> 
> I think you've answered it pretty competently.

What, the BSDs don't get a free pass to dump junk into the process. I'm shocked :)

But we have bug-boy pants over in BSD land, so that shouldn't be a problem.

Warner

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux