On Feb 19, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:47:56AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Jason Cooper <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I think we have two options: >> >> 1. Bring out everything in the current kernel repo to a separate one, >> but do it my mirroring over. Changes go into the kernel repo first and >> then comes over to this one, but other projects can mirror the >> standalone repo without downloading a whole kernel tree. > > I prefer this one. Assuming that a separate repo is mostly agreed upon, > this allows us to provide the tree in an easily digestible way without > impacting the current workflow. > > Also, if it works for the other projects, no one says we have to move > beyond this step. I just joined this list... What's the scope of what would move into the new repo? The dts files with the binding docs, or also the code to implement those bindings? Warner -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
