Hi Arnd,
[adding Samsung guys into the loop]
Am Dienstag, den 18.02.2014, 19:10 +0100 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> On Tuesday 18 February 2014 16:34:41 Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > +
> > +Example of a device that is part of a power domain:
> > +
> > + vpu: vpu@02040000 {
> > + reg = <0x02040000 0x3c000>;
> > + /* ... */
> > + fsl,power-domain = <&pd_pu>;
> > + /* ... */
> > + };
> > +
>
> I'm really not too happy about platforms starting to add random
> bindings for power domains. Unfortunately I didn't catch exynos
> doing this first, but I don't want to see another platform like
> that.
>
> Can we please come up with a proper generic power domain binding
> first and then add platform specific users?
what is the process here? I've seen the samsung bindings and copied the
pattern. I guess the Exynos bindings are set in stone, and the i.MX
power domains can be handled using the same bindings.
regards
Philipp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
