Hi Hoan,
On 13 April 2018 17:37 Hoan Tran wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 1:51 AM, Phil Edworthy wrote:
> > The DesignWare GPIO IP can be configured for either 1 interrupt or 1
> > per GPIO in port A, but the driver currently only supports 1 interrupt.
> > See the DesignWare DW_apb_gpio Databook description of the
> > 'GPIO_INTR_IO' parameter.
> >
> > This change allows the driver to work with up to 32 interrupts, it
> > will get as many interrupts as specified in the DT 'interrupts' property.
> > It doesn't do anything clever with the different interrupts, it just
> > calls the same handler used for single interrupt hardware.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > One point to mention is that I have made it possible for users to have
> > unconncted interrupts by specifying holes in the list of interrupts.
> > This is done by supporting the interrupts-extended DT prop.
> > However, I have no use for this and had to hack some test case for this.
> > Perhaps the driver should support 1 interrupt or all GPIOa as interrupts?
> >
> > v3:
> > - Rolled mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio fix into this patch to avoid
> > bisect problems
> > v2:
> > - Replaced interrupt-mask DT prop with support for the interrupts-
> extended
> > prop. This means replacing the call to irq_of_parse_and_map() with calls
> > to of_irq_parse_one() and irq_create_of_mapping().
> >
> > Note: There are a few *code* lines over 80 chars, but this is just guidance,
> > right? Especially as there are already some lines over 80 chars.
> > ---
[snip]
> > - if (has_acpi_companion(dev) && pp->idx == 0)
> > - pp->irq = platform_get_irq(to_platform_device(dev), 0);
> > + if (has_acpi_companion(dev) && pp->idx == 0) {
> > + pp->irq[0] = platform_get_irq(to_platform_device(dev), 0);
> > + if (pp->irq[0])
> > + pp->has_irq = true;
> > + }
>
> It doesn't work for ACPI. Could you do the same logic for ACPI?
I don’t have access to any device that was baked (i.e. fabbed) with multiple
output interrupts from the Synopsys GPIO blocks and use ACPI. I don't
know if any such device exists.
I would prefer not writing code that can be tested easily. I cannot even
test the current, albeit small, changes to the Intel Quark MFD.
Regards
Phil
> Thanks
> Hoan
>
> >
> > pp->irq_shared = false;
> > pp->gpio_base = -1;
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c
> > b/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c
> > index 90e35de..5bddb84 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c
> > @@ -233,7 +233,8 @@ static int intel_quark_gpio_setup(struct pci_dev
> *pdev, struct mfd_cell *cell)
> > pdata->properties->idx = 0;
> > pdata->properties->ngpio = INTEL_QUARK_MFD_NGPIO;
> > pdata->properties->gpio_base = INTEL_QUARK_MFD_GPIO_BASE;
> > - pdata->properties->irq = pdev->irq;
> > + pdata->properties->irq[0] = pdev->irq;
> > + pdata->properties->has_irq = true;
> > pdata->properties->irq_shared = true;
> >
> > cell->platform_data = pdata;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h
> > b/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h
> > index 2dc7f4a..5a52d69 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h
> > @@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ struct dwapb_port_property {
> > unsigned int idx;
> > unsigned int ngpio;
> > unsigned int gpio_base;
> > - unsigned int irq;
> > + unsigned int irq[32];
> > + bool has_irq;
> > bool irq_shared;
> > };
> >
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
