On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 6:14 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The CPU's idle state nodes are currently parsed at the common cpuidle DT > library, but also when initializing back-end data for the arch specific CPU > operations, as in the PSCI driver case. > > To avoid open-coding, let's introduce of_get_cpu_state_node(), which takes > the device node for the CPU and the index to the requested idle state node, > as in-parameters. In case a corresponding idle state node is found, it > returns the node with the refcount incremented for it, else it returns > NULL. > > Moreover, for ARM, there are two generic methods, to describe the CPU's > idle states, either via the flattened description through the > "cpu-idle-states" binding [1] or via the hierarchical layout, using the > "power-domains" and the "domain-idle-states" bindings [2]. Hence, let's > take both options into account. > > [1] > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt > [2] > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/psci.txt > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Lina Iyer <ilina@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Suggested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> > Co-developed-by: Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/of/base.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/of.h | 8 ++++++++ > 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+) Some reason you didn't add my Reviewed-by from v6? Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html