On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 02:21:02PM +0800, Kevin Hao wrote: > + /* > + * Matching compatible is better than matching type and name, > + * and the specific compatible is better than the general. > + */ > + if (matches->compatible[0] && > + __of_device_is_compatible_score(node, > + matches->compatible, &score)) > + score = INT_MAX - 4 * score; It seems that we also need to adjust the above as what we do for the type and name. The v3 is coming. Thanks, Kevin
Attachment:
pgpghhgUjnPNm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
