Hi, On Tuesday 03 April 2018 04:13 PM, Gustavo Pimentel wrote: > Hi Kishon, > > On 02/04/2018 06:35, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> >> >> On Wednesday 28 March 2018 05:08 PM, Gustavo Pimentel wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Please add a commit message. > > Ok. I'll add. Thanks for noticing it. > >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt | 13 +++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt >>> index 6300762..4bb2e08 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/designware-pcie.txt >>> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ >>> Required properties: >>> - compatible: >>> "snps,dw-pcie" for RC mode; >>> + "snps,dw-pcie-ep" for EP mode; >>> - reg: Should contain the configuration address space. >>> - reg-names: Must be "config" for the PCIe configuration space. >>> (The old way of getting the configuration address space from "ranges" >>> @@ -56,3 +57,15 @@ Example configuration: >>> #interrupt-cells = <1>; >>> num-lanes = <1>; >>> }; >>> +or >>> + pcie_ep: pcie_ep@dfc00000 { >>> + compatible = "snps,dw-pcie-ep"; >>> + reg = <0xdfc00000 0x0001000>, /* IP registers 1 */ >>> + <0xdfc01000 0x0001000>, /* IP registers 2 */ >> >> Doesn't this have iATU unroll space? > > I don't think EP has it, but I'm no expert on this matter. Can you provide me > some example of having iATU unroll space mapping would be useful in EP scope? I'm not sure. I thought if the dwc3 core version is 4.80, then it'll have a separate ATU space irrespective of RC mode or EP mode. Thanks Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html