Hi Bjorn,
On 3/27/2018 10:42 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Fri 23 Mar 03:18 PDT 2018, Sricharan R wrote:
>> +#include "qcom-ipq4019-ap.dk04.1.dtsi"
>> +
>> +/ {
>> + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. IPQ4019/AP-DK04.1-C1";
>> +
>
> If this is the board and qcom-ipq4019-ap.dk04.1.dtsi is the platform
> file then the compatible should be here and not there. Also qcom,ipq4019
> is not an awesome compatible for a board file.
>
ok, agree. Will correct the compatible and move it here.
>> + soc {
>> + dma@7984000 {
>> + status = "ok";
>> + };
>> +
>> + qpic-nand@79b0000 {
>> + pinctrl-0 = <&nand_pins>;
>> + pinctrl-names = "default";
>> + status = "ok";
>> + };
>
> nand_pins defines the muxing and is defined in the other dtsi. So please
> move these pinctrl-* properties to the dtsi.
>
> As long as the node is disabled the pinctrl state won't be applied
> anyways.
>
>
> If there are electrical properties that needs to be specified you can
> override the pinctrl state in the board specific file.
>
ok, understood. Will follow these conventions in rest of the places as well.
Regards,
Sricharan
--
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
