Hi, On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 11:11 PM, Manu Gautam <mgautam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Update compatible strings for USB2 PHYs on sdm845. > There are two QUSB2 PHYs present on sdm845. Few PHY registers > programming is different for these PHYs related to electrical > parameters, otherwise both are same. > > Signed-off-by: Manu Gautam <mgautam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-qusb2-phy.txt | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-qusb2-phy.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-qusb2-phy.txt > index 42c9742..b99a57f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-qusb2-phy.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-qusb2-phy.txt > @@ -6,7 +6,9 @@ QUSB2 controller supports LS/FS/HS usb connectivity on Qualcomm chipsets. > Required properties: > - compatible: compatible list, contains > "qcom,msm8996-qusb2-phy" for 14nm PHY on msm8996, > - "qcom,qusb2-v2-phy" for QUSB2 V2 PHY. > + "qcom,qusb2-v2-phy" for QUSB2 V2 PHY, > + "qcom,sdm845-qusb2-phy-1" for primary PHY on sdm845, > + "qcom,sdm845-qusb2-phy-2" for secondary PHY on sdm845. Similar question to the one I posed on <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10302761/> for the QMP PHY. What is "qcom,qusb2-v2-phy"? Is it some ideal abstract version of the PHY? Do we expect that anyone would actually use that compatible string? In this case in <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10302755/> it looks as if you're using the same settings as "qcom,sdm845-qusb2-phy-2", so presumably "qcom,qusb2-v2-phy" should just be deleted. -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
