On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 11:39 +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote: > Hi Bart, > > On Friday 23 March 2018 10:46 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > 2018-03-23 18:08 GMT+01:00 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > > Quoting Bartosz Golaszewski (2018-03-23 09:55:47) > > > > 2018-03-23 17:49 GMT+01:00 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > > Quoting Bartosz Golaszewski (2018-03-23 06:04:47) > > > > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > > > This series converts the only user of the handcoded, mach-specific reset > > > > > > routines in the davinci platform to using the reset framework. > > > > > > > > > > > > Patch 1 modifies the way lookup entries are registered with the reset > > > > > > framework. > > > > > > > > > > > > Patches 2-4 add necessary lookups/DT-properties. > > > > > > > > > > > > Patches 5-7 convert the davinci-rproc driver to the reset framework. > > > > > > > > > > > > Patch 8 removes now dead code. > > > > > > > > > > > > Philipp: it turned out that it's indeed better to use the reset > > > > > > controller's device name for the entry lookup. > > > > > > > > > > > > Tested both in DT and legacy modes by booting the examples from > > > > > > ti-ipc-rtos recipe in meta-ti. > > > > > > > > > > > > This series applies on top of David Lechner's common-clk-v9 branch[1] > > > > > > with Philipp Zabel's reset/next branch[2] pulled in. > > > > > > > > > > > > It can be found in my github tree as well[3]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What's the merge strategy for the rest of the patches? I should apply > > > > > the clk ones after the next -rc1? > > > > > > > > Or maybe Philipp can provide us with an immutable branch with the reset patches? > > > > > > > > The you could apply the driver patches and let Sekhar take all the > > > > platform code? > > > > > > > > > > Ok that could work too. > > > > Ohad, Bjorn can you ack the remoteproc patches? Are you OK with > > Stephen taking them through the clock tree? Otherwise it would get > > complicated since they depend on the first clk patch and the last clk > > patch depends on them. > > I will not be queuing the DTS patches for v4.17. They depend on clock > framework DTS patches which itself I plan to queue for v4.18. Given > this, I think the best bet is: > > Ohad/Bjorn queue remoteproc patches already acked by Suman and having no > dependencies. That is, 5/8 and 6/8. > > If Philipp can provide an immutable branch with reset changes, it will > be great and Stephen can queue 4/8. If not, its best to resend that > patch to Stephen once v4.17-rc1 is out. I have shuffled reset/next a bit and moved Bartosz' patches onto a separate, immutable branch: git://git.pengutronix.de/git/pza/linux.git reset/lookup regards Philipp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
