> >>+static const struct resource lm3633_effect_resources[] = {
> >>+ {
> >>+ .name = LM3633_EFFECT_BL0_RAMPUP,
> >>+ .flags = IORESOURCE_REG,
> >>+ .start = LM3633_EFFECT_REGISTER(BL0_RAMPUP),
> >>+ },
<snip>
> >>+ {
> >>+ .name = LM3633_EFFECT_PTN_HIGHBRT,
> >>+ .flags = IORESOURCE_REG,
> >>+ .start = LM3633_EFFECT_REGISTER(HIGHBRT),
> >>+ },
> >>+};
> >
> >Can you define a MACRO to do all of these as one liners?
>
> Yes, resource definitions will be replaced by simple macro,
> LMU_EFFECT_RESOURCE().
>
> For example,
>
> #define LMU_EFFECT_RESOURCE(chip, effect) \
> { \
> .name = chip##_EFFECT_##effect, \
> .flags = IORESOURCE_REG, \
> .start = LMU_EFFECT_REGISTER(chip, effect), \
> }
>
> static const struct resource lm3633_effect_resources[] = {
> LMU_EFFECT_RESOURCE(LM3633, BL0_RAMPUP),
<snip>
> LMU_EFFECT_RESOURCE(LM3633, PTN_HIGHBRT),
> };
>
> and so on.
Yes, this is what I had in mind.
> >>+ pdata->en_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(node, "ti,enable-gpio", 0);
> >
> >There is a global DT property for this already.
>
> I've not found it yet, but I agree it looks like general property.
> So I'll replace "ti,enable-gpio" with "ti,lmu-en-gpio".
Just re-use "gpio-enable". No need for it to be vendor specific.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
