On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 14:59:41 +0100 > Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> So, not super-happy about that either. And maybe leave the mux >> where it is? It's just that I have the feeling that the iio-mux >> is never going to get any friends in its category, and the mux >> and the unit-converter are kind of related in that they operate >> on other channels. But maybe that's only logical it you know how >> they are implemented... > > Perhaps Analog Front ends? > We could move the amplifier driver into the same directory as well, > though right now that driver is not passing the channels through > (it's often used without there being an IIO ADC behind it I think...) (passive) linear scaler? analog linear scaler? But maybe these supersets are not broad enough. Or just invent another acronym akin to "PHY" such as "AIF" (analog interface)? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
