> -----Original Message----- > From: netdev-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:netdev-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Richard Cochran > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 11:58 AM > To: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>; David Miller > <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>; Mark Rutland > <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>; Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@xxxxxxxxxx>; Rob > Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Willem de Bruijn <willemb@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [PATCH net-next RFC V1 1/5] net: Introduce peer to peer one step PTP > + > + /* > + * Same as HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC, but also enables time > + * stamp insertion directly into PDelay_Resp packets. In this > + * case, neither transmitted Sync nor PDelay_Resp packets will > + * receive a time stamp via the socket error queue. > + */ > + HWTSTAMP_TX_ONESTEP_P2P, > }; > I am guessing that we expect all devices which support onestep P2P messages, will always support onestep SYNC as well? Thanks, Jake -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
