On 19-03-18 22:08, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Mike Looijmans (2018-03-19 08:04:15)
On 18-03-18 13:52, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 12:50:08PM +0100, Mike Looijmans wrote:
+Required properties:
+ - compatible: One of "silabs,si514a", "silabs,si514b" "silabs,si514c" according
+ to the speed grade of the chip.
+ - reg: I2C device address.
+ - #clock-cells: From common clock bindings: Shall be 0.
+
+Optional properties:
+ - clock-output-names: From common clock bindings. Recommended to be "si544".
What's the point if there is only 1 clock output?
I have a board with 6 of these chips, and the clock registration fails if they
don't have unique names. Providing a clock-output-names property was the
easiest way around it.
Should I just omit the line or change the wording to reflect the above or is
there a better solution (maybe I can use the DT node name as clock name in the
driver, will look into that)
I would leave clock-output-names for now. One day we can get off of
strings in CCF. Soon perhaps.
+
+Example:
+ si544: clock-generator@55 {
clock-controller@55 is the standard node name.
I'll change and post patch v3
I made some comments on v1. Please fold those into v3.
Thanks, found them on patchwork, somehow they didn't end up in my mailbox.
Comments are clear, will incorporate them, I only have trouble with your
remark on the DT documentation "Can this reference stuff go to the bottom of
this document?". I copied the style from the other documents in the same
directory, I'm slightly puzzled about where the reference part should go now.
Kind regards,
Mike Looijmans
System Expert
TOPIC Products
Materiaalweg 4, NL-5681 RJ Best
Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
E-mail: mike.looijmans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Website: www.topicproducts.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
