From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx> This patch marks all the gsbi i2c node at soc level dtsi, so that kernel would not assume that its enabled and result in pin conflicts when gsbi is used for UART or SPI. Without this patch we see below pin conflict. apq8064-pinctrl 800000.pinctrl: pin GPIO_20 already requested by 12450000.serial; cannot claim for 12460000.i2c apq8064-pinctrl 800000.pinctrl: pin-20 (12460000.i2c) status -22 apq8064-pinctrl 800000.pinctrl: could not request pin 20 (GPIO_20) from group gpio20 on device 800000.pinctrl i2c_qup 12460000.i2c: Error applying setting, reverse things back i2c_qup: probe of 12460000.i2c failed with error -22 Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi index 3ca96e361878..54cff79f5725 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi @@ -444,6 +444,7 @@ clock-names = "core", "iface"; #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; + status = "disabled"; }; }; @@ -472,6 +473,7 @@ clock-names = "core", "iface"; #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; + status = "disabled"; }; }; @@ -497,6 +499,7 @@ clock-names = "core", "iface"; #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; + status = "disabled"; }; }; @@ -521,6 +524,7 @@ clocks = <&gcc GSBI4_QUP_CLK>, <&gcc GSBI4_H_CLK>; clock-names = "core", "iface"; + status = "disabled"; }; }; -- 2.16.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
