On Monday 05 March 2018 03:08 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote: > On 05/03/18 11:30, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Hi Adrian, >> >> On Monday 19 February 2018 02:21 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote: >>> On 05/02/18 14:50, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>>> Add quirk to disable HW timeout if the requested timeout is more than >>>> the maximum obtainable timeout. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 12 ++++++++++++ >>>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h | 7 +++++++ >>>> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c >>>> index 070aff9c108f..1aa74b4682f3 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c >>>> @@ -735,6 +735,12 @@ static u8 sdhci_calc_timeout(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_command *cmd) >>>> DBG("Too large timeout 0x%x requested for CMD%d!\n", >>>> count, cmd->opcode); >>>> count = 0xE; >>>> + if (host->quirks2 & SDHCI_QUIRK2_DISABLE_HW_TIMEOUT) { >>>> + host->ier &= ~SDHCI_INT_DATA_TIMEOUT; >>>> + sdhci_writel(host, host->ier, SDHCI_INT_ENABLE); >>>> + sdhci_writel(host, host->ier, SDHCI_SIGNAL_ENABLE); >>>> + host->hw_timeout_disabled = true; >>>> + } >>> >>> sdhci_calc_timeout() is really for calculations so please do this in >>> sdhci_set_timeout() instead (i.e. change sdhci_calc_timeout() to return >>> whether the timeout is too big). Note that you need to cater for the "/* >>> Unspecified timeout, assume max */" case and the >>> SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_TIMEOUT_VAL case. >>> >>> Also if SDHCI_INT_DATA_TIMEOUT is not being disabled, check here to >>> re-enable it and leave sdhci_request_done() alone. i.e. >>> >>> else if (!(host->ier & SDHCI_INT_DATA_TIMEOUT)) { >>> host->ier |= SDHCI_INT_DATA_TIMEOUT; >>> sdhci_writel(host, host->ier, SDHCI_INT_ENABLE); >>> sdhci_writel(host, host->ier, SDHCI_SIGNAL_ENABLE); >>> } >>> >>> Maybe make a separate subroutine for the update: >>> >>> void sdhci_set_data_timeout_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, bool enable) >>> { >>> if (enable) >>> host->ier |= SDHCI_INT_DATA_TIMEOUT; >>> else >>> host->ier &= ~SDHCI_INT_DATA_TIMEOUT; >>> sdhci_writel(host, host->ier, SDHCI_INT_ENABLE); >>> sdhci_writel(host, host->ier, SDHCI_SIGNAL_ENABLE); >>> } >>> >>> >>>> } >>>> >>>> return count; >>>> @@ -2349,6 +2355,12 @@ static bool sdhci_request_done(struct sdhci_host *host) >>>> } >>>> >>>> sdhci_del_timer(host, mrq); >>>> + if (sdhci_data_line_cmd(mrq->cmd) && host->hw_timeout_disabled) { >>>> + host->ier |= SDHCI_INT_DATA_TIMEOUT; >>>> + sdhci_writel(host, host->ier, SDHCI_INT_ENABLE); >>>> + sdhci_writel(host, host->ier, SDHCI_SIGNAL_ENABLE); >>>> + host->hw_timeout_disabled = false; >>>> + } >>>> >>>> /* >>>> * Always unmap the data buffers if they were mapped by >>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h >>>> index afab26fd70e6..3a967a56fcc3 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h >>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h >>>> @@ -437,6 +437,11 @@ struct sdhci_host { >>>> #define SDHCI_QUIRK2_CLOCK_DIV_ZERO_BROKEN (1<<15) >>>> /* Controller has CRC in 136 bit Command Response */ >>>> #define SDHCI_QUIRK2_RSP_136_HAS_CRC (1<<16) >>>> +/* >>>> + * Disable HW timeout if the requested timeout is more than the maximum >>>> + * obtainable timeout >>>> + */ >>>> +#define SDHCI_QUIRK2_DISABLE_HW_TIMEOUT (1<<17) >> >> Are you okay with the definition of this quirk? i.e this quirk is applied only >> when the requested timeout is "more" than the maximum obtainable timeout. >> >> By this way platforms can continue to use hardware timeout for smaller timeout >> value. > > It is fine to me. > Okay thanks. I've posted v3 sometime last week. I'm trying to get this in for 4.17? Can you review the new revision please? Thanks Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html