Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] dt-bindings: add bindings for USB physical connector

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07.03.2018 12:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Chanwoo, Archit,
>>
>> On 07.03.2018 05:48, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>> On 2018년 03월 07일 11:12, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>>> Hi Rob and Andrzej,
>>>>
>>>> On 2018년 03월 06일 21:53, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>>>> Hi Rob, Chanwoo, Krzysztof,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 27.02.2018 08:11, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for reviews of previous iterations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patchset introduces USB physical connector bindings, together with
>>>>>> working example.
>>>>>> I have removed RFC prefix - the patchset seems to be heading
>>>>>> to a happy end :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> v5: fixed extra parenthesis in dts, renamed extcon function.
>>>>>> v4: improved binding descriptions, added missing reg in dts.
>>>>>> v3: Separate binding for Samsung 11-pin connector, added full-blown USB-C
>>>>>>     example.
>>>>>> v2: I have addressed comments by Rob and Laurent, thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes in datail are described in the patches.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Andrzej
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrzej Hajda (5):
>>>>>>   dt-bindings: add bindings for USB physical connector
>>>>>>   dt-bindings: add bindings for Samsung micro-USB 11-pin connector
>>>>>>   arm64: dts: exynos: add micro-USB connector node to TM2 platforms
>>>>>>   arm64: dts: exynos: add OF graph between MHL and USB connector
>>>>>>   extcon: add possibility to get extcon device by OF node
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maciej Purski (1):
>>>>>>   drm/bridge/sii8620: use micro-USB cable detection logic to detect MHL
>>>>> It looks like all patches received R-B or acks (I forgot add Krzysztof's
>>>>> acks for dts part).
>>>>> Now I have a question how to merge them.
>>>>> The only functional dependency is between bridge and extcon, and from
>>>>> the formal PoV bindings should be merged 1st.
>>>>> I can merge it:
>>>>> 1. All patches via drm-misc tree.
>>>>> 2. All patches except dts via drm-misc, and Krzysztof will merge dts via
>>>>> samsung-soc tree.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it OK, for all? Better ideas?
>>>> Krzysztof picked the dts patches. I'll make the immutable branch based on v4.16-rc1
>>>> and apply them except for dts patchs. And I'll send the immutable branch to Rob and Andrzej.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I made the immutable branch[1] as following: If you agree, I'll send pull request.
>>> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/extcon.git/log/?h=ib-extcon-drm-dt-v4.17
>>>
>>> Or you can make the immutable branch and send pull request to Rob and me.
>>>
>> It seems you took v5 instead of v6 version of extcon patch.
> I also took v5:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10244407/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10244431/
>
> There was no v6 in samsung-soc patchwork. Is it a problem for DTS?

No, v6 was only typo fix in comment, and only extcon patch has v6.

Regards
Andrzej

>
> BR,
> Krzysztof
>
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux