On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 03:48:32PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > Unfortunately for us, fsl-mc is conceptually rather like PCI in that it's > software-discoverable and the only thing described in DT is the bus "host", > thus we need the same sort of thing as for PCI to map from the child > devices back to the bus root in order to find the appropriate firmware > node. Worse than PCI, though, we wouldn't even have the option of > describing child devices statically in firmware at all, since it's actually > one of these runtime-configurable "build your own network accelerator" > hardware pools where userspace gets to create and destroy "devices" as it > likes. I really hate the PCI special case just as much. Maybe we just need a dma_configure method on the bus, and move PCI as well as fsl-mc to it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
