On 02/27/2018 09:39 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:53:08 +0200
> Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 02/27/2018 05:49 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
>>> On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 20:38:49 +0200
>>> Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>>> +static const struct of_device_id mxc_rnga_of_match[] = {
>>>> + { .compatible = "fsl,imx31-rnga", },
>>>> + { /* sentinel */ },
>>>> +};
>>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mxc_rnga_of_match);
>>>> +#endif
>>>> +
>>>> static struct platform_driver mxc_rnga_driver = {
>>>> .driver = {
>>>> - .name = "mxc_rnga",
>>>> - },
>>>> + .name = "mxc_rnga",
>>>> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(mxc_rnga_of_match),
>>>
>>> Does this build if CONFIG_OF is not set?
>>
>> Definitely it is expected to be built, you can verify it directly or
>> check of_match_ptr() macro definition from include/linux/of.h
>
> Thanks, I verified it by removing the SOC_IMX31 dependency, and with
> netwinder_defconfig as a base. I also verified that the #ifdef
> CONFIG_OF protecting the mxc_rnga_of_match definition is also not
> needed.
That's a commonplace observation, but I have serious doubts, if it
has become a common practice to remove CONFIG_OF and CONFIG_ACPI
macro guards around device id lists. Still I would prefer to save
compiled code size.
Arnd or Greg, your valued opinion is much appreciated.
--
With best wishes,
Vladimir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
