On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 11:06:07AM +0100, jacopo mondi wrote:
> Hi Geert,
>
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:27:16AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 8:06 PM, Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Add "#interrupt-cells" property and "interrupt-controller" label to
> > > "interrupt-controller@e61c0000" device node.
> > >
> > > This silences the following DTC compiler warnings:
> > > Warning (interrupts_property): Missing interrupt-controller or
> > > interrupt-map property in /soc/interrupt-controller@e61c0000
> > > Warning (interrupts_property): Missing #interrupt-cells in
> > > interrupt-parent /soc/interrupt-controller@e61c000
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77965.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77965.dtsi
> > > @@ -316,6 +316,8 @@
> > > };
> > >
> > > intc_ex: interrupt-controller@e61c0000 {
> > > + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> > > + interrupt-controller;
> > > reg = <0 0xe61c0000 0 0x200>;
> > > /* placeholder */
> >
> > (bikeshedding) Should the placeholder be at the top of the node?
>
> I would like it more too, but in M3-W dtsi:
>
> pciec0: pcie@fe000000 {
> reg = <0 0xfe000000 0 0x80000>;
> /* placeholder */
> };
>
> So I kept using the same style everywhere here.
>
> I can change it everywhere in this series to have placeholder at the
> beginning of the node definition if you agree with that!
Either way is fine by me. But if we do change it lets change it everywhere.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
