Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: add binding for i.MX8MQ IOMUXC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> So it seems with that we are at a point where the majority vote of
> users/maintainers are in favor of keeping the binding that has served
> us well on MX5/6. Which is right where we started with v1 of the MX8
> patches.
>
> How do we proceed? I would like to send out a respin of those series
> next week. Can we all agree to roll back the pinctrl binding to the
> MX5/6 one? Or are there still major reservations against it? I would
> like to avoid introducing any unnecessary churn.

What we need to see is for i.MX maintainers to agree, e.g.
figure out how to do all stuff in drivers/pinctrl/freescale/*
should be engineered going forward.

(Maybe that filepath and symbols needs to be renamed drivers/pinctrl/imx
by the way, this platform seems to change company more often
than I change my car tyres.)

I'll try to follow up on the resulting patch series.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux