Hi, Arnd Sorry late for you. The following two suggestions we have really discussed https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/30/1077 -----邮件原件----- 发件人: arndbergmann@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:arndbergmann@xxxxxxxxx] 代表 Arnd Bergmann 发送时间: 2018年2月19日 17:58 收件人: liwei (CM) 抄送: Rob Herring; Mark Rutland; xuwei (O); Catalin Marinas; Will Deacon; Vinayak Holikatti; James E.J. Bottomley; Martin K. Petersen; Kevin Hilman; Gregory CLEMENT; Thomas Petazzoni; Masahiro Yamada; Riku Voipio; Thierry Reding; Krzysztof Kozlowski; Eric Anholt; DTML; Linux Kernel Mailing List; Linux ARM; linux-scsi; zangleigang; Gengjianfeng; Guodong Xu; Zhangfei Gao; Fengbaopeng (kevin, Kirin Solution Dept) 主题: Re: [PATCH v8 2/5] dt-bindings: scsi: ufs: add document for hisi-ufs On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Li Wei <liwei213@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > add ufs node document for Hisilicon. > > Signed-off-by: Li Wei <liwei213@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufs-hisi.txt | 37 > ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufs-hisi.txt I'm pretty sure we've discussed it before, but can you make this so that the generic properties are part of the ufshcd binding, and you refer to it from here, only describing in what ways the hisi ufs binding differs from the standard? > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufs-hisi.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufs-hisi.txt > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..0d21b57496cf > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/ufs-hisi.txt > @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ > +* Hisilicon Universal Flash Storage (UFS) Host Controller > + > +UFS nodes are defined to describe on-chip UFS hardware macro. > +Each UFS Host Controller should have its own node. > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible : compatible list, contains one of the following - > + "hisilicon,hi3660-ufs", "jedec,ufs-1.1" for hisi ufs > + host controller present on Hi36xx chipset. > +- reg : should contain UFS register address space & UFS SYS CTRL register address, > +- interrupt-parent : interrupt device > +- interrupts : interrupt number > +- clocks : List of phandle and clock specifier pairs > +- clock-names : List of clock input name strings sorted in the same > + order as the clocks property. > +"ref_clk", "phy_clk" is optional The clock names sound generic enough, should we have both in the generic binding? "ref_clk" is in the ufshcd-pltfrm binding, but "phy_clk" is not; what do you mean is that these two don't need to document here? > +- resets : reset node register, one reset the clk and the other reset the controller > +- reset-names : describe reset node register This looks incomplete. What is the name of the reset line supposed to be? I'd also suggest you document it in the ufshcd binding instead. As discussed in https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/30/1077; If document it in the ufshcd binding, I think it needs some codes to parse them in ufshcd.c/ufshcd-pltfrm.c, but I think these codes may not be applicable to other SOC manufacturers. Arnd ��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
