On 02/22/2018 04:53 AM, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 8:36 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 208 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>; >> >> Please do not use IRQ_TYPE_NONE, ever. It doesn't exist in the GIC >> binding. Set it to the actual trigger value. >> > >>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 481 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>; >> >> Same here. > > Thanks for the review Marc! > > > Andy: If I'm reading everything correctly you're the one who would > collect these patches and apply them. Is that right? Do they look OK > to you in general? Would you prefer that Rajendra send out a v5 with > the fixes pointed out by Marc, or would you prefer to fix them up > yourself when applying? Is now a good time or would you prefer to > wait? I just fixed up to remove all instances of IRQ_TYPE_NONE and sent a v5 out. > > Thanks! :) > > -Doug > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
