On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 February 2014 19:29:19 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Josh Cartwright <joshc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Ideally, all xxx_device_id look like
>>
>> struct xxx_device_id {
>> ... /* bus-specific ID information */
>> kernel_ulong_t driver_data;
>> };
>>
>> This may be formalized in some way, using a base class, but thay may
>> require reordering the fields, like:
>>
>> struct base_device_id {
>> kernel_ulong_t driver_data;
>> long id[0];
>> };
>>
>
> You can't reorder the fields because they are shared with user
> space in form of the module-init-tools.
Sure, that's part of the ABI.
But that doesn't mean we can't change the ID as stored in the platform_device.
Many drivers don't want to know the ID, only the driver_data part.
Having that in a uniform way across the different ID types would help.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
