* Sebastian Reichel <sre@xxxxxxxxxx> [180218 00:32]:
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 01:07:23PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > For reference here is what I measured for total power consumption on
> > an idle Droid 4 with and without USB related MDM6600 modules:
> >
> > idle lcd off phy-mapphone-mdm6600 ohci-platform
> > 153mW 284mW 344mW
>
> So more than twice the idle power... We really want to get runtime
> PM working :/
Yes and we want' modem to idle too :)
> > +/*
> > + * MDM6600 status codes. These are copied from Motorola Mapphone Linux
> > + * kernel tree. The BB naming here refers to "BaseBand" for modem.
> > + */
>
> Actually your status codes are BP_ (baseband processor) prefixed.
I'll just get rid of the naming and stick to MDM6600 prefixies.
No need to keep the confusing BP/AP prefixes.
> > +static void phy_mdm6600_init_irq(struct phy_mdm6600 *ddata)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = ddata->dev;
> > + int i, error, irq;
> > +
> > + for (i = PHY_MDM6600_STATUS0;
> > + i <= PHY_MDM6600_STATUS2; i++) {
> > + if (IS_ERR(ddata->gpio[i]))
> > + continue;
>
> This can be dropped, since the driver errors out of probe
> when there are gpio errors.
True will drop.
> > +static int phy_mdm6600_init_lines(struct phy_mdm6600 *ddata)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = ddata->dev;
> > + int i, j, nr_gpio = 0;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(phy_mdm6600_line_map); i++) {
> > + const struct phy_mdm6600_map *map =
> > + &phy_mdm6600_line_map[i];
> > +
> > + for (j = 0; j < map->nr_gpios; j++) {
> > + struct gpio_desc **gpio = &ddata->gpio[nr_gpio];
> > +
> > + *gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev,
> > + map->name, j,
> > + map->direction);
> > + if (IS_ERR(*gpio)) {
> > + dev_info(dev,
> > + "gpio %s error %li, already taken?\n",
> > + map->name, PTR_ERR(*gpio));
> > + return PTR_ERR(*gpio);
> > + }
> > + nr_gpio++;
> > + }
>
> I think the code should use the gpiod_get_array() API.
OK thanks will take a look.
> > + /* Give up shared GPIOs now, they will be used for OOB wake */
> > + devm_gpiod_put(ddata->dev, mode_gpio0);
> > + ddata->gpio[PHY_MDM6600_MODE0] = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> > + devm_gpiod_put(ddata->dev, mode_gpio1);
> > + ddata->gpio[PHY_MDM6600_MODE0] = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>
> You want PHY_MDM6600_MODE1 instead. Also I would just use NULL.
> NULL is used by gpiod_get_optional and is handled by the gpiod
> functions, so you don't need to check for gpio errors everywhere.
Oops yup let's just drop this until we know what to do in the
further patches.
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > +static const struct of_device_id phy_mdm6600_id_table[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "motorola,mapphone-mdm6600", },
> > + {},
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, phy_mdm6600_id_table);
> > +#endif
>
> I suggest to just depend on CONFIG_OF in Kconfig and drop the ifdef
> and of_match_ptr() parts. It's very unlikely, that this will be
> used without DT and would need quite some rework anyways.
OK
> > +static int phy_mdm6600_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct phy_mdm6600 *ddata;
> > + struct usb_otg *otg;
> > + const struct of_device_id *of_id;
> > + int error;
> > +
> > + of_id = of_match_device(of_match_ptr(phy_mdm6600_id_table),
> > + &pdev->dev);
> > + if (!of_id)
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> I suggest to drop the of_match_device(). The driver will error
> out anyways when it can't get the gpios.
OK
> Generally I'm a bit worried about handling the mode gpios in two
> different drivers. It looks like it might become a dependency hell.
Yeah you're right. That will require the modules to be loaded
in the right order. It's probably best that we handle the mdm6600
to SoC wake-up in this driver. And then maybe export a function for
toggling the SoC to mdm660 wake to make sure the dependencies are
clear for the modules.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
