On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:20:00AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:45:54PM -0500, Jason Cooper wrote: > > > The bootloader would then load this file into ram, and pass the > > address/size to the kernel either via dt, or commandline. kaslr (run in > > the decompressor) would consume some of this randomness, and then > > random.c would consume the rest in a non-crediting initialization. > > Sure is a neat idea, but I think in general it would probably be smart > to include the entire FDT blob in the early random pool, that way you > get MACs and other machine unique data too. Sure. > From there it is a small step to encourage bootloaders to include > boot-time-variable data in the DT like like 'boot time of day', 'cycle > counter', 'random blob', etc. I like it. > Then you just need the bootloader to dump the random-seed file into a > DT property. Yes, see my response to Arnd re the binding. I'm also interested in making it easier for devices already in the field. iow, without upgrading the bootloader. > Or have the bootloader fetch randomness from any HWRNG it has a driver > for. (eg a TPM) Depends on who you're protecting against. I'd prefer to have that called out as a separate blob in the DT so the kernel could decide whether to trust it explicitly, or mix it like random.c already does with RDRAND. thx, Jason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html