On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 02:25:38PM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:30:08AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Why are we adding a separate DT node with no content for this? This is
> > a single chip, we already know that the CODEC part is there from the DT
> > telling us that the chip is there and what we decide is part of the
> > CODEC is going to depend on what the OS running on the system is doing.
> While it looks empty in the DT binding file, it's actually not empty
> once some standard properties are added to support audio-graph-card.
This tells me you're missing something in the binding defining the DAIs
and...
> A real world example looks like this:
> &cpcap {
> audio-codec {
> compatible = "motorola,cpcap-audio-codec";
> #sound-dai-cells = <1>;
...that still doesn't require a compatible here.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
