Am Mittwoch, den 12.02.2014, 15:25 +0800 schrieb Shawn Guo:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 02:27:11PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > The PGC that is part of GPC controls isolation and power sequencing of the
> > PU power domain. The power domain will be handled by the generic pm domain
> > framework and needs a phandle to the PU regulator to turn off power when
> > the domain is disabled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
> > index 253d82c..595750d 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi
> > @@ -598,9 +598,17 @@
> > };
> >
> > gpc: gpc@020dc000 {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <1>;
> > compatible = "fsl,imx6q-gpc";
> > reg = <0x020dc000 0x4000>;
> > interrupts = <0 89 0x04 0 90 0x04>;
> > + pu-supply = <®_pu>;
> > +
> > + pd_pu: power-domain@020dc260 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,power-domain";
> > + reg = <0x020dc260 0x10>;
> > + };
>
> It's time to have a binding doc for gpc/pgc?
Yes, I'll add one for the next version.
> And I'm not sure
> "fsl,power-domain" is a good compatible as it's so generic.
fsl,imx6q-power-domain ?
Currently there is no need for a compatible property at all, since this
node is just used as a phandle target.
Even the 0x260 register offset is hardcoded in the driver, but this
might change when imx6sl support is added.
regards
Philipp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
