Hi Stephen, nice work! On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 2:13 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > For now, we plumb this into the gpiochip irq APIs so that > GPIO/pinctrl drivers can use the gpiochip_irqchip_irq_valid() to > test validity of GPIOs. But is that the right thing to do, given that we just took the trouble to define a DT binding that is explicitly about any GPIO, not just IRQ capable ones? I am worries that the *irq* infix etc on these functions will be a bit confusing. Is it a lot of work to make it just generic and maybe bake it into the gpio_chip so as to refuse already in gpiod_request_commit() in gpiolib already? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
