Re: [PATCH] of: cache phandle nodes to decrease cost of of_find_node_by_phandle()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





My question was trying to determine whether the numbers reported above
are for a debug configuration or a production configuration.
My reported numbers are from debug configuration.

not a production configuration, I was requesting the numbers for a
production configuration.
I'm working on it. But please expect some delay in my response for this. As I mentioned earlier, I need to work with few teams to get these numbers.


show a significant boot time reduction from the patch then there is
less justification for adding complexity to the existing code.  I
prefer to use simpler data structures and algorithms __if__ extra
complexity does not provide any advantage.  The balance between
complexity and benefits is a core software engineering issue.

Ok

I don't have a set up for taking these numbers in perf mode. For
that, I need to ask some other team and round trip follow ups. In my
set up, I rely on serial console logging which gets disabled in perf
mode.


Thanks,

Frank


Chintan


Chintan
--
Qualcom India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center,
Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation
Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux