On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 09:37:11PM +0100, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote: > On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Uwe Kleine-König > <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 01:07:52AM +0100, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote: > >> The eSDHC does not work properly if the SION bit is not set for the > >> bidirectional CMD signal, whatever the eSDHC instance and the selected > >> pad. Therefore, setting SION is mandatory for all eSDHC CMD ports. Do > >> this for MX25_PAD_*__SD*_CMD in imx25-pinfunc.h in order to enforce this > >> behavior for all boards. > >> > >> This had already been done for eSDHC1, but not for eSDHC2. Also, define > >> MX25_PAD_FEC_MDC__SDHC2_CMD so that all the possible cases are covered > >> from now on. > > > > There is an inconsistency in the naming. The eSDHC1 CMD constants are > > named: > > > > MX25_PAD_SD1_CMD__SD1_CMD > > > > The reference calls this: > > > > CMD of instance: esdhc1. > > > > The register name is correct though. Not sure it's worth to fix this to > > use consistent naming (which would result in: > > > > MX25_PAD_SD1_CMD__ESDHC1_CMD > > > > which looks ugly, too). > > Indeed. I had also noticed this. I can send a patch to apply before > this one. But that would break the out-of-tree DT files using these > definitions. Would that be OK? That's OK, I would say. It could be a reminder of that they should upstream their files. Shawn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
