Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] iommu/arm-smmu: Add pm_runtime/sleep ops

[Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 1/31/2018 5:53 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 19/01/18 11:43, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> > From: Sricharan R <sricharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The smmu needs to be functional only when the respective
> > master's using it are active. The device_link feature
> > helps to track such functional dependencies, so that the
> > iommu gets powered when the master device enables itself
> > using pm_runtime. So by adapting the smmu driver for
> > runtime pm, above said dependency can be addressed.
> >
> > This patch adds the pm runtime/sleep callbacks to the
> > driver and also the functions to parse the smmu clocks
> > from DT and enable them in resume/suspend.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > [vivek: Clock rework to request bulk of clocks]
> > Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 55 
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >   1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> > index 78d4c6b8f1ba..21acffe91a1c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> > @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
> >   #include <linux/of_iommu.h>
> >   #include <linux/pci.h>
> >   #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> >   #include <linux/slab.h>
> >   #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> >   @@ -205,6 +206,9 @@ struct arm_smmu_device {
> >       u32                num_global_irqs;
> >       u32                num_context_irqs;
> >       unsigned int            *irqs;
> > +    struct clk_bulk_data        *clocks;
> > +    int                num_clks;
> > +    const char * const        *clk_names;
>
> This seems unnecessary, as we use it a grand total of of once, during 
> initialisation when we have the source data directly to hand. Just 
> pass data->clks into arm_smmu_init_clks() as an additional argument.

Sure, will do that.
> Otherwise, I think this looks reasonable; it's about as unobtrusive as 
> it's going to get.

Thanks for reviewing.

regards
Vivek

> Robin.
>
> >       u32                cavium_id_base; /* Specific to Cavium */
> >   @@ -1685,6 +1689,25 @@ static int arm_smmu_id_size_to_bits(int size)
> >       }
> >   }
> >   +static int arm_smmu_init_clocks(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> > +{
> > +    int i;
> > +    int num = smmu->num_clks;
> > +
> > +    if (num < 1)
> > +        return 0;
> > +
> > +    smmu->clocks = devm_kcalloc(smmu->dev, num,
> > +                    sizeof(*smmu->clocks), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +    if (!smmu->clocks)
> > +        return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +    for (i = 0; i < num; i++)
> > +        smmu->clocks[i].id = smmu->clk_names[i];
> > +
> > +    return devm_clk_bulk_get(smmu->dev, num, smmu->clocks);
> > +}
> > +
> >   static int arm_smmu_device_cfg_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> >   {
> >       unsigned long size;
> > @@ -1897,10 +1920,12 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_cfg_probe(struct 
> > arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> >   struct arm_smmu_match_data {
> >       enum arm_smmu_arch_version version;
> >       enum arm_smmu_implementation model;
> > +    const char * const *clks;
> > +    int num_clks;
> >   };
> >     #define ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(name, ver, imp)    \
> > -static struct arm_smmu_match_data name = { .version = ver, .model = 
> > imp }
> > +static const struct arm_smmu_match_data name = { .version = ver, 
> > .model = imp }
> >     ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(smmu_generic_v1, ARM_SMMU_V1, GENERIC_SMMU);
> >   ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(smmu_generic_v2, ARM_SMMU_V2, GENERIC_SMMU);
> > @@ -2001,6 +2026,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(struct 
> > platform_device *pdev,
> >       data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> >       smmu->version = data->version;
> >       smmu->model = data->model;
> > +    smmu->clk_names = data->clks;
> > +    smmu->num_clks = data->num_clks;
> >         parse_driver_options(smmu);
> >   @@ -2099,6 +2126,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct 
> > platform_device *pdev)
> >           smmu->irqs[i] = irq;
> >       }
> >   +    err = arm_smmu_init_clocks(smmu);
> > +    if (err)
> > +        return err;
> > +
> >       err = arm_smmu_device_cfg_probe(smmu);
> >       if (err)
> >           return err;
> > @@ -2197,7 +2228,27 @@ static int __maybe_unused 
> > arm_smmu_pm_resume(struct device *dev)
> >       return 0;
> >   }
> >   -static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(arm_smmu_pm_ops, NULL, arm_smmu_pm_resume);
> > +static int __maybe_unused arm_smmu_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +    struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +
> > +    return clk_bulk_prepare_enable(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clocks);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __maybe_unused arm_smmu_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +    struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +
> > +    clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(smmu->num_clks, smmu->clocks);
> > +
> > +    return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct dev_pm_ops arm_smmu_pm_ops = {
> > +    SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(NULL, arm_smmu_pm_resume)
> > +    SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(arm_smmu_runtime_suspend,
> > +               arm_smmu_runtime_resume, NULL)
> > +};
> >     static struct platform_driver arm_smmu_driver = {
> >       .driver    = {

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html