On 01/29/2018 06:31 AM, Oleksandr Shamray wrote: > When a need raise up to use JTAG interface for system's devices > programming or CPU debugging, usually the user layer > application implements jtag protocol by bit-bang or using a > proprietary connection to vendor hardware. > This method can be slow and not generic. > > We propose to implement general JTAG interface and infrastructure > to communicate with user layer application. In such way, we can > have the standard JTAG interface core part and separation from > specific HW implementation. > This allow new capability to debug the CPU or program system's > device via BMC without additional devices nor cost. Oleksandr, you have completed dodged my questions here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/25/163 can you try to respond to some of these questions please? -- Florian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
