On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [180125 01:22]: >> On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 02:13:33AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > The "wakeup-interrupt" property at the bridge level basically has to be defined >> > as the wakeup interrupt for all devices on the bus under the bridge. >> >> The only thing I'm at a loss for is whether this goes in (referring to >> rk3399-gru.dtsi) &pcie or &pci_rootport. I think some versions of this >> series have been aiming for the former, and some the latter. > > I'd keep the wakeup interrupt property at the rootport level. That way > it can work with whatever pcie card that might be plugged into that > slot. That is in case it's just a slot and not hardwired pcie device :) Do I understand correctly that &pcie is the device and the &pci_rootport is the port that device is connected to? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
