> Note: there is still technically a misreprentation of how the PHY is > "attached" to the network device. In your DTSes, you have to have the > CPU port have a "phy-handle" to the internal PHY, while technically it > should be the i210 which has a "phy-handle" property to that PHY, and > even better, if the e1000e/idb drivers were PHYLIB capable, they could > manage it directly. Hi Florian Err, i don't think i agree. But maybe i'm missunderstanding. We have two back-to-back PHYs. I would expect the i210 MAC to have a phy-handle pointing it its PHY. The CPU port would then point to the internal switch PHY. Or are you suggesting the i210 has two phy-handles, its own and the switches? Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
