Hi Hans,
On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 11:23:12AM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 21/01/18 11:21, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > On 21/01/18 10:53, jacopo mondi wrote:
> >> Hi Hans,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 12:20:19PM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >>> static int ov7670_g_parm(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, struct v4l2_streamparm *parms)
> >>> {
> >>> struct v4l2_captureparm *cp = &parms->parm.capture;
> >>> struct ov7670_info *info = to_state(sd);
> >>>
> >>> if (parms->type != V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE)
> >>> return -EINVAL;
> >>>
> >>> And parms->type is CAPTURE_MPLANE. Just drop this test from the ov7670 driver
> >>> in the g/s_parm functions. It shouldn't test for that since a subdev driver
> >>> knows nothing about buffer types.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I will drop that test in an additional patch part of next iteration of this series,
> >
> > Replace g/s_parm by g/s_frame_interval. Consider g/s_parm for subdev drivers as
> > deprecated (I'm working on a patch series to replace all g/s_parm uses by
> > g/s_frame_interval).
>
> Take a look here:
>
> https://git.linuxtv.org/hverkuil/media_tree.git/log/?h=parm
>
> You probably want to use the patch 'v4l2-common: add g/s_parm helper functions'
> for the new ceu driver in your patch series. Feel free to add it.
Thanks, I have now re-based my series on top of your 'parm' branch,
and now I have silenced those errors on bad frame interval.
CEU g/s_parm now look like this:
static int ceu_g_parm(struct file *file, void *fh, struct v4l2_streamparm *a)
{
struct ceu_device *ceudev = video_drvdata(file);
int ret;
ret = v4l2_g_parm(V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_CAPTURE_MPLANE,
ceudev->sd->v4l2_sd, a);
if (ret)
return ret;
a->parm.capture.readbuffers = 0;
return 0;
}
Very similar to what you've done on other platform drivers in this
commit:
https://git.linuxtv.org/hverkuil/media_tree.git/commit/?h=parm&id=a58956ef45cebaa5ce43a5f740fe04517b24a853
I have a question though (please bear with me a little more :)
I had to manually set a->parm.capture.readbuffers to 0 to silence the following
error in v4l2_compliance (which I have now updated to the most recent
remote HEAD):
fail: v4l2-test-formats.cpp(1114): cap->readbuffers
test VIDIOC_G/S_PARM: FAIL
fail_on_test(cap->readbuffers > VIDEO_MAX_FRAME);
if (!(node->g_caps() & V4L2_CAP_READWRITE))
fail_on_test(cap->readbuffers);
else if (node->g_caps() & V4L2_CAP_STREAMING)
fail_on_test(!cap->readbuffers);
CEU does not support CAP_READWRITE, as it seems atmel-isc/isi do not, so
v4l2-compliance wants to have readbuffers set to 0. I wonder why in
the previously mentioned commit you didn't have to set readbuffers
explicitly to 0 for atmel-isc/isi as I had to for CEU. Will v4l2-compliance
fail if run on atmel-isc/isi with your commit, or am I missing something?
Thanks
j
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
