On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 5:28 PM, Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The Broadcom STB PCIe host controller is intimately related to the > memory subsystem. This close relationship adds complexity to how cpu > system memory is mapped to PCIe memory. Ideally, this mapping is an > identity mapping, or an identity mapping off by a constant. Not so in > this case. > > Consider the Broadcom reference board BCM97445LCC_4X8 which has 6 GB > of system memory. Here is how the PCIe controller maps the > system memory to PCIe memory: > > memc0-a@[ 0....3fffffff] <=> pci@[ 0....3fffffff] > memc0-b@[100000000...13fffffff] <=> pci@[ 40000000....7fffffff] > memc1-a@[ 40000000....7fffffff] <=> pci@[ 80000000....bfffffff] > memc1-b@[300000000...33fffffff] <=> pci@[ c0000000....ffffffff] > memc2-a@[ 80000000....bfffffff] <=> pci@[100000000...13fffffff] > memc2-b@[c00000000...c3fffffff] <=> pci@[140000000...17fffffff] > > Although there are some "gaps" that can be added between the > individual mappings by software, the permutation of memory regions for > the most part is fixed by HW. The solution of having something close > to an identity mapping is not possible. > > The idea behind this HW design is that the same PCIe module can > act as an RC or EP, and if it acts as an EP it concatenates all > of system memory into a BAR so anything can be accessed. Unfortunately, > when the PCIe block is in the role of an RC it also presents this > "BAR" to downstream PCIe devices, rather than offering an identity map > between its system memory and PCIe space. > > Suppose that an endpoint driver allocs some DMA memory. Suppose this > memory is located at 0x6000_0000, which is in the middle of memc1-a. > The driver wants a dma_addr_t value that it can pass on to the EP to > use. Without doing any custom mapping, the EP will use this value for > DMA: the driver will get a dma_addr_t equal to 0x6000_0000. But this > won't work; the device needs a dma_addr_t that reflects the PCIe space > address, namely 0xa000_0000. > > So, essentially the solution to this problem must modify the > dma_addr_t returned by the DMA routines routines. There are two > ways (I know of) of doing this: > > (a) overriding/redefining the dma_to_phys() and phys_to_dma() calls > that are used by the dma_ops routines. This is the approach of > > arch/mips/cavium-octeon/dma-octeon.c MIPS is rarely an example to follow. :) > In ARM and ARM64 these two routines are defiend in asm/dma-mapping.h > as static inline functions. > > (b) Subscribe to a notifier that notifies when a device is added to a > bus. When this happens, set_dma_ops() can be called for the device. > This method is mentioned in: > > http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/of/platform.c?v=3.16#L152 Why refer to an external website when you can just refer to the source of the project this patch applies to directly. > where it says as a comment > > "In case if platform code need to use own special DMA > configuration, it can use Platform bus notifier and > handle BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE event to fix up DMA > configuration." In the current tree, this comment is in drivers/of/device.c. > Solution (b) is what this commit does. It uses its own set of > dma_ops which are wrappers around the arch_dma_ops. The > wrappers translate the dma addresses before/after invoking > the arch_dma_ops, as appropriate. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
