On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:50 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 12:45 PM, Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I have more dtc checks in the works (nothing for 4.16 :) ). I'd like >> the process to work better. I'm not going to fix all the warnings. I >> don't think Arnd should either. Turning them off by default hasn't >> worked great either. For some, I'm not sure we can ever get to warning >> free, but I'd like new stuff to have warnings enabled and no one >> builds with W=1. We could put together tooling to just show new >> warnings, but someone has to run it and enforce it. I could stick dtc >> updates into linux-next for multiple cycles before sending to Linus. > > I'll split up and report DT warnings separate from compiler, seems > like a reasonable approach. Maybe also report any other output from the build process as another category. When things build fine, we should see no output at all. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html