Hey Mark- On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:18:34PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:51:27AM -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote: > > > config SPI_QUP > > tristate "Qualcomm SPI Support with QUP interface" > > depends on OF > > depends on ARM > > Does this really depend on ARM? If so why? The ARM dependency is there for the use of _relaxed io accessor variants. > > depends on ARCH_MSM_DT || COMPILE_TEST > > > With Kumar's pending the ARCH_MSM_DT -> ARCH_QCOM rename, we'll > > introduce a arm-soc/spi tree dependency here that we'll need to keep > > track of. > > It seems simpler to just depend on MSM_DT || ARCH_QCOM or whatever. ARCH_MSM_DT is going away, so maybe this is the best option for the short term (a later patch can remove ARCH_MSM_DT from here at some point in the future). Josh -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
