On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 7:32 PM, JeffyChen <jeffy.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Rob, >> >> Thanks for your reply. >> >> On 12/27/2017 07:56 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >>>> >>>> > >>>> > drivers/of/of_pci_irq.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> >>> Please move this to drivers/pci/of.c (or perhaps create pci/of_irq.c). >>> >>>> > drivers/pci/Makefile | 1 + >>>> > drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 10 +++++++ >>>> > drivers/pci/pci-of.c | 75 >>>> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> >>> We already have drivers/pci/of.c. It's not clear what the difference is >>> from the filenames. Either merge with of.c or perhaps of-pm.c. >> >> >> this new file does something similar to the pci-acpi.c and pci-mid.c.. > > pci-acpi.c has similar things to pci/of.c. The naming is just not consistent. > > Also, I plan to move the rest of drivers/of/of_pci* to drivers/pci. > >> and i am agree the naming is not clear, maybe we can rename both of those >> files to something like pci-pm-***.c? > > At least pci-acpi.c is more than just PM functions, so that doesn't > make sense. Given that all the ACPI related functions are in 1 file, > we should do the same for DT. Agreed. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html